- Services
SERVICES
- Platform
PLATFORM
- Solutions
AI AGENTS
LIFE SCIENCES AI
TECHNOLOGY
- Industries
INDUSTRIES
- Work
- About Us
CORPORATE
RESOURCES
- Contact us
eCTD authoring and submission automation is the use of AI to draft, assemble, validate, and publish electronic Common Technical Document submissions to health authorities, replacing the manual authoring and publishing work between completed study data and a filed dossier.
The eCTD is the standard structured format for submissions to agencies including the FDA, EMA, and Health Canada, organised into five modules. Module 1 carries region specific administrative content; Modules 2 through 5 carry summaries, quality, non-clinical, and clinical documentation. A single submission can run to thousands of documents with hyperlinks, bookmarks, and cross references that must all resolve correctly.
The work divides into two halves. Authoring produces narrative content from source data. Assembly and publishing organise it into the required structure and verify it meets technical specification before submission.
The work is high volume, highly structured, and unforgiving.
Regulatory writers draft narrative sections from clinical study reports, preclinical summaries, and CMC data, often with different writers producing structurally inconsistent output for the same document type, which generates downstream rework. Publishing teams then assemble everything into the correct hierarchy, verify that every table, figure, and citation resolves, apply region specific Module 1 requirements for each target market, and catch structural violations before upload.
The failure mode is expensive. A gateway rejection for a broken hyperlink, a missing file, or an incorrect format costs days at exactly the point in a programme where days are most valuable. And the workload scales with every additional product, indication, and market, which is why regulatory headcount has historically grown in step with portfolio breadth rather than with output.
Wizr eCTD Studio is an end to end authoring and assembly engine rather than a document management system with an AI layer added. It drafts eCTD narrative sections directly from clinical study reports, preclinical summaries, and CMC data, producing consistent structure and quality regardless of which writer is assigned, and Wizr AI reports up to 70 percent faster authoring.
Dedicated agents collaborate to author, collate, classify, cross reference, validate, translate, and assemble, with complete traceability and regulatory oversight. The platform is eCTD 4.0 compliant, runs real time compliance checks during assembly rather than as a terminal step, handles region specific Module 1 requirements automatically for submissions across more than 60 countries, and verifies every table, figure, and citation across all five modules. Gateway errors including broken hyperlinks, missing files, incorrect formats, and structural violations are caught before upload.
A documented deployment with a global pharmaceutical manufacturer, using a multi-agent eCTD preparation platform, reports a 45 to 55 percent reduction in preparation time and a 40 percent reduction in manual review effort, with regulatory experts spending less time on repetitive checks and more on scientific and strategic review.
An electronic batch record is the complete manufacturing record for a single production batch: the materials used, the equipment and parameters, the in-process checks, the personnel involved, and the deviations encountered. Batch record intelligence is the application of AI to reviewing those records and to analysing patterns across them.
Batch record review is a release gating activity. Before a batch can be released to market, someone must confirm the record is complete, that entries are within specification, that deviations are documented and resolved, and that nothing is missing. This is review by exception in principle and page by page verification in practice, and it sits directly on the critical path between production and revenue.
The distinction between the two applications matters. Record review examines a single batch for completeness and conformance. Cross batch analysis examines many batches for trends, drift, and correlations that predict future problems. The first accelerates release; the second improves the process.
Four things, in order of how quickly they show value.
Completeness checking becomes exhaustive rather than sampled. Every required entry, signature, and attachment verified on every record, which is mechanical work that human reviewers perform inconsistently under time pressure.
Exception identification becomes the entry point. Rather than reading the record to find the exceptions, the reviewer receives the exceptions and the context around them, which is what review by exception was always meant to be.
Cross batch pattern detection becomes feasible. Parameter drift, equipment correlated variances, and recurring minor deviations that never individually triggered investigation are visible across records and effectively invisible within one.
Release cycle time shortens. Because review sits on the critical path, time removed here converts directly into inventory turns rather than into general efficiency.
The release decision itself remains with the qualified person. AI performs verification and analysis; the disposition decision is a regulated judgement.
Wizr AI provides Electronic Batch Record Intelligence within its pharma and biotech portfolio, alongside CAPA Management and Intelligence as part of its compliance and quality operations capability.
Placing the two together is what enables the cross record analysis described above, since deviations recorded during production and the CAPA records that follow them are the same evidence viewed at different stages. Pattern analysis confined to one record type sees a fraction of what is available.
Wizr AI’s regulated solutions are built with traceability, audit readiness, and human review at defined control points, which for batch records means automated verification and analysis with the release decision retained by qualified personnel.
An embedding is a numerical representation of meaning. A passage of text is converted into a list of numbers positioned so that content with similar meaning sits close together, which allows similarity to be computed mathematically rather than matched lexically.
A vector database stores these embeddings alongside the original content and its metadata, and retrieves the entries closest in meaning to a query. Together they are the retrieval mechanism underneath most enterprise AI systems.
The capability they provide is meaning based search. A query about cancelling a subscription retrieves content about terminating an account, ending a plan, or closing a membership, none of which shares a keyword with the query. That is the property keyword search cannot provide and the reason retrieval over enterprise content became practical.
Four, and the first two account for most of the variance in production systems.
Chunking strategy. How source documents are divided determines what can be retrieved. Chunks too small lose the context that makes them interpretable; too large dilute meaning and waste tokens. Respecting document structure, such as sections and procedural steps, usually outperforms fixed length splitting.
Embedding model choice. Different models capture different notions of similarity, and domain heavy content with specialised terminology may retrieve poorly under a general purpose embedding model.
Metadata and permission tagging. Storing source, version, date, and access permissions alongside each embedding is what makes filtered and entitlement aware retrieval possible. Omitting permissions at ingestion makes secure retrieval unachievable later without reprocessing.
Hybrid search. Pure semantic similarity handles meaning well and exact identifiers poorly. Part numbers, ticket references, error codes, and proper nouns need keyword matching alongside the semantic component, which is why production systems combine both.
Re-ranking after an initial broad retrieval is the other common addition, improving precision at modest cost.
Retrieval quality depends on what feeds it, which is why Wizr AI treats the data layer as a distinct workstream rather than an assumption. Data engineering is a named capability within Enterprise AI Services, described as integrating, optimising, and classifying data to be used by AI models.
Enterprise AI is the application of artificial intelligence to the operations of a large organisation, using its own data, connected to its own systems, and subject to its own security, compliance, and accountability requirements. It differs from consumer AI less in the underlying models than in everything surrounding them.
Three constraints define the category. Enterprise data is permissioned, so an AI system must respect who is allowed to see what rather than treating a knowledge base as uniformly readable. Enterprise actions are consequential, so an incorrect output can create financial, regulatory, or contractual exposure. And enterprise AI is accountable, meaning someone must be able to explain after the fact what the system did and why.
Enterprise AI is therefore not a scaled up version of a chatbot. The reasoning model is frequently the least differentiated component in the stack. What determines whether a deployment works is the quality of the data feeding it, the depth of integration into systems of record, and the governance that makes it approvable.
Most organisations now have AI in production somewhere. Fewer have it in production across many processes, and the difference is rarely model capability.
Integration reach. Programmes stall when AI can read enterprise state but not change it, because reading produces recommendations while writing produces completed work.
Data readiness. Fragmented, duplicated, and stale content limits accuracy in ways no model choice compensates for. Enterprises frequently discover their content problem only after retrieval exposes it.
A repeatable governance path. If every use case renegotiates security review, permissions, and audit requirements from scratch, the programme moves at the speed of its approval process rather than its engineering.
Ownership after go-live. AI systems degrade quietly as data changes and knowledge ages. Without named operational ownership, accuracy declines without anyone noticing until users stop trusting the system.
The pattern that scales is consolidation: one governed platform carrying integrations, retrieval, and controls, with use cases built on top of it rather than beside it.
Wizr AI operates across two connected areas. The first automates enterprise operations through the Wizr Enterprise AI Platform and pre-built agents for customer support, IT support management, and finance and accounting. The second accelerates how enterprises build software, through Enterprise Digital Engineering, Product Engineering, and the Glidepath AI SDLC accelerator.
Enterprise AI Services covers the work either area depends on: AI workflow automation, AI agents, AI assistants, data engineering to integrate, optimise and classify data for AI models, model fine tuning, and AI Ops for continuous management of data and models.
Deployments span pharma and biotech, automotive, and higher education, with published case studies covering regulatory submission preparation, spare parts cataloguing, and AI driven software engineering.
An enterprise AI platform is the foundational software layer on which an organisation builds, deploys, and governs AI applications, including AI agents, AI assistants, and agentic workflows, using its own data and systems. It provides shared capabilities such as model access, retrieval, orchestration, integration, security, and monitoring, so each new use case does not rebuild them.
Six components define a complete platform. Data and knowledge connectivity ingests enterprise content and propagates access permissions through to retrieval. A retrieval and grounding layer supplies verified context to models at inference time. Agent and workflow building blocks provide the components for constructing and orchestrating agents. A tool and integration layer connects to enterprise applications and determines how much real work agents can perform. Governance and security controls cover access, policy, audit logging, and the certifications that let security teams approve deployment. Observability exposes quality, cost, and behaviour in production.
The alternative to a platform is not simplicity, it is duplication: several parallel integrations to the same CRM, several retrieval implementations with different access control behaviour, and no consolidated view of what AI is doing.
An LLM API provides model inference. Everything that makes a model useful in an enterprise sits outside it: grounding in proprietary data, entitlement aware retrieval, integration with systems of record, permissioned action, audit trails, and monitoring.
A development framework supplies code libraries for building AI applications and leaves operations, governance, and integration to the builder. That suits a team building a product and does not suit an enterprise standardising AI across dozens of business processes.
A point AI application solves one use case and governs only itself, which is acceptable in isolation and becomes an audit problem at the tenth application.
An enterprise AI platform is defined by what it assumes: that data is sensitive and permissioned, that actions carry consequence, that auditors will ask, that the model will be replaced, and that use cases will multiply. Those assumptions produce a feature set weighted toward governance, integration, and operability rather than developer flexibility. The commercial effect is that the first use case pays for the shared foundation and every subsequent one inherits it.
The Wizr Enterprise AI Platform is the foundation for all Wizr AI offerings and is organised into four published components: the Agentic Platform for building and deploying agents and assistants, Agentic Workflows for orchestrating multi step, multi agent processes, Security for governance and data protection, and Integrations for connectivity into enterprise applications and data sources.
The security layer holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certification with GDPR compliance, and applies least privilege access audited to SOC 2 Type II, encryption in transit and at rest to ISO 27001 standards, and continuous oversight through real time monitoring and scheduled independent audits.
Above the platform sits Wizr AI Assembly, a stack of pre-built components spanning integration, agent and workflow management, agent libraries, and ready to deploy applications, which Wizr AI states supplies around 80 percent of the functionality needed to go live.
Enterprise AI security is the protection of AI systems, the data they process, and the actions they can take, covering access control, encryption, isolation, monitoring, and the certification evidence that lets security and legal functions approve deployment.
AI systems introduce exposures conventional application security does not fully address. They read broadly, since a retrieval system may have access across a knowledge estate that no individual user could reach, which makes entitlement filtering a security control rather than a feature. They act with credentials, so a compromised or manipulated agent is a privileged actor. They process untrusted content, since documents, tickets, and emails may contain instructions targeting the model. And they retain context, so information from one interaction can surface in another if isolation is imperfect.
Compliance is the evidence layer around this: certifications, documented data handling, and contractual commitments that allow an enterprise to demonstrate the controls exist rather than assert it.
Six checks, in the order security reviews usually apply them.
Certifications and their scope. SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 are the expected baseline. Type II matters specifically because it tests operating effectiveness over a period rather than design at a point in time.
Data handling commitments in writing. Whether customer data is used to train models, where it is processed, how long it is retained, and what happens on termination. These belong in the data processing agreement, not in marketing copy.
Entitlement propagation. Whether retrieval enforces the requester’s existing permissions. A system that ignores this is a data leak with a convenient interface.
Encryption in transit and at rest, with clear key management.
Tenant isolation, so no context, cache, or memory crosses customer boundaries.
Monitoring and independent audit, meaning both continuous internal oversight and scheduled external verification.
Wizr AI holds SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 certification with GDPR compliance, and states that it holds customer data and end customer data to the highest global standards.
The published controls map directly to the checks above. Data access operates on least privilege, audited to SOC 2 Type II. Encryption is applied end to end, in transit and at rest, to ISO 27001 standards. Continuous oversight combines real time monitoring with scheduled independent audits. Security is described as designed into the product rather than bolted on later, and secure data processing maintains confidentiality and integrity at every stage of handling.
Contractual terms are published in the data processing agreement, privacy policy, and terms and conditions, which is where processing location, retention, and subprocessor commitments should be verified for a specific engagement. Full detail on the platform controls is on the Security page.
Enterprise context is the organisation specific knowledge an AI system needs to produce engineering output that fits: architecture standards, coding conventions, domain models, existing patterns, reference implementations, prior design documents, integration examples, and the decisions behind them.
It is the difference between AI that writes competent generic code and AI that writes code resembling what your best engineer would have written. A model without context knows how software is written in general. It does not know that your organisation deprecated a pattern two years ago, that this domain concept has a specific meaning here, or that this integration has a house approach for a reason.
The economic point is that generated output which does not fit still costs review and rework. Fast production of code a reviewer must reshape can be slower than writing it, which is why context quality rather than generation speed determines whether AI assistance nets out positive.
Four requirements, and the first is where most organisations discover a problem.
The context must be written down. Architecture decisions in people’s heads, conventions learned by osmosis, and standards agreed in meetings cannot be supplied to a model. Organisations frequently find that adopting AI engineering forces documentation work that was deferred for years.
It must be current and version controlled. Stale standards are worse than absent ones, because AI propagates them consistently and quickly across many artefacts before anyone notices.
It must include examples, not only rules. A stated principle is weaker guidance than a reference implementation. Tested reference code, prior design documents, and worked integrations transfer far more than a style guide.
It must be structured for retrieval. A large unindexed repository is not context. The relevant material has to be findable at the moment it is needed.
There is a compounding effect worth noting. The same context that improves AI output also accelerates human onboarding, since a new engineer working from a maintained single source of truth reaches standard-conforming work sooner. The investment serves both.
Context engineering from a single source of truth is the first named pillar of Glidepath AI SDLC. Wizr AI describes a version-controlled repository holding coding standards, architectures, and reusable artefacts, alongside ready-to-use BRDs, HLDs, LLDs, tested code, and reference integrations.
That combination maps directly onto the requirements above. The repository addresses the written down and version controlled requirements. Tested code and reference integrations address the need for examples rather than rules alone. Reference BRDs, HLDs, and LLDs extend context beyond code into specification and design, which is where fit matters most and where generic AI output is weakest.
The context is then applied where the work happens rather than in a separate tool. Wizr AI infuses enterprise context into assistants already in use including GitHub Copilot and Cursor, and into a pre-built agent library tailored to the customer’s stack. Wizr AI reports a 40 to 50 percent developer productivity lift with lower rework, and rework is the metric context most directly affects.
Enterprise system integration for AI is the work of connecting AI systems to the applications where business data lives and business actions happen: ERP, CRM, ITSM, HR systems, document repositories, and proprietary internal applications. It covers both reading state and writing changes back.
Integration is usually the largest and most underestimated portion of an enterprise AI project. Model selection takes days. Establishing authenticated, permissioned, tested, auditable connections to a dozen systems, several of which are heavily customised, takes considerably longer, and it is what determines whether an agent can complete a process or merely describe one.
The requirement is stricter than generic API access. AI integration must carry entitlement inheritance, so the AI cannot read or write beyond the permissions of the person or process it acts for; transactional integrity, so partial failures do not leave records inconsistent; and audit linkage, so every automated write traces back to the case and authority that produced it.
An AI system’s practical value is bounded by the systems it can act in, not by the sophistication of its reasoning.
A support agent that can answer a question about an order but cannot check its real status is a search interface. A finance agent that can identify a payment mismatch but cannot post the correction has relocated the work rather than completed it. In both cases a better model changes nothing, because the constraint is not comprehension.
This is why demonstrations and production deployments diverge so sharply. A demonstration runs on sample data with simulated actions, so the reasoning is fully visible and the integration is absent. Production requires the reverse: the reasoning is usually adequate, and the difficulty lies in connecting to a fifteen year old ERP instance with local customisations, resolving how permissions map, and proving to an auditor that every write is attributable.
Assessing integration realistically at the evaluation stage, by naming the specific systems and the specific operations required rather than counting connectors, is the single most useful correction to enterprise AI planning.
Connectivity is delivered through the Integrations component of the Wizr Enterprise AI Platform, which connects agents and workflows into existing enterprise applications and data sources alongside the security and governance layer.
The finance and accounting agents demonstrate the depth involved, operating against SAP, Oracle Fusion, Salesforce, and QuickBooks to cross reference purchase orders, clear reconciliation items within tolerance, and post validated transactions back to the ERP. Dedicated solutions exist for Oracle ERP and Fusion and for Salesforce.
Where integration work extends beyond agent connectivity into API and platform engineering, it is delivered through Enterprise Digital Engineering, which covers API and integration engineering alongside application modernisation.
