Services

AI Agent Governance

Inventory, cost, risk and governance for all your enterprise agents.

A managed service that gives you one place to see every agent, how each one is performing, and what to change next.

On track, 6 Watch, 1 At risk, 3 Circle size is weekly cost

10

Agents monitored

92%

Average accuracy

$29.2K

Weekly AI spend

3

Agents flagged

The problem

Your enterprise is running dozens of AI agents with limited visibility

Custom agents built by internal teams. Agents embedded inside Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow and Microsoft. Point solutions stood up by individual departments.

No unified inventory

No one can list every agent in production today, custom-built or vendor-embedded, let alone who owns each one.

No spend and performance baseline

Accuracy, cost and latency are never measured consistently, so quality degradation goes unnoticed until it becomes a customer complaint.

No risk visibility

PII exposure, hallucination, drift and unauthorized actions carry real regulatory and brand risk, invisible until something breaks.

Five moving parts, delivered as a managed service

Reporting starts in week one. The infrastructure grows only as fast as you need it.

  1. Agent inventory

    Complete register of every AI agent in use, custom-developed and third-party.

  2. Baseline metrics

    Accuracy, cost, latency, risk, drift and business outcome measured consistently for every agent, on day one.

  3. Weekly executive report

    A recurring report to CEO, CFO and CTO on risk exposure, agent performance and recommended changes.

  4. Real-time analytics

    As maturity grows, move from weekly reporting to live dashboards refreshed daily, then hourly.

  5. Optimize

    Model right-sizing, workflow fixes, guardrails and performance improvements.

Agent inventory

You can't govern what you can't see

We build a single, living register of every agent in your enterprise.

Custom-developed agents

  • Internal LLM and agent workflows (Azure, LangGraph, OpenAI, Bedrock and more)
  • Team- or department-built copilots and automations
  • Client-facing agents built by Wizr or other partners

Third-party and vendor-embedded agents

  • Salesforce Agentforce, SAP Joule, ServiceNow Now Assist
  • Microsoft Copilot, Workday, Adobe and other SaaS-native agents
  • Any AI capability turned on inside a licensed platform, whether IT approved it or not

How we build it

  1. Discover

    Structured discovery across IT, procurement and department leads

  2. Audit

    System and license audit across vendor platforms in use

  3. Attribute

    Attribution of each agent to a department, client or product

  4. Monitor

    Gaps flagged and closed as new agents are discovered

Baseline metrics

Every agent measured against the same six dimensions

Performance and risk become comparable across the enterprise.

MetricMeasurement approach
AccuracyHuman review, golden dataset, LLM-as-judge, business rule validation
Spend and costPlatform consumption, model usage, infrastructure and license cost
Latency and reliabilityResponse and resolution time against SLA
Risk and compliancePII exposure, policy violation, hallucination, unauthorized action
Business outcomeTime and effort saved, tickets resolved, invoices processed, cases closed, orders completed
Drift and changeChange in answer quality or behavior over time

Weekly executive report

Agent-level risk, cost and accuracy in one view

All 10 monitored agents, week of Jun 29 to Jul 5. Three are flagged, each for a different reason.

  • 10 Agents monitored
  • 92% Average accuracy
  • $29.2K Weekly AI spend
  • 3 Agents flagged for review
AgentPlatformAccuracyLatencyCost / wkAI features liveRisk factor
Claims IntakeCustom96%4,200 ms$3.1KOn track—
Customer Service BotCustom95%3,800 ms$2.8KOn track—
Policy Renewal AssistantCustom93%5,100 ms$2.2KOn track—
Document ExtractionServiceNow97%2,900 ms$1.9KOn track—
Agent Performance CoachCustom92%3,400 ms$1.4KOn track—
Billing Inquiry BotCustom94%3,600 ms$2.0KOn track—
Underwriting SupportAgentforce91%6,100 ms$4.2KWatchAccuracy drifting toward threshold
Claims Fraud TriageCustom88%7,200 ms$5.6KAt riskAccuracy below threshold
Vendor Invoice MatchingSAP Joule79%5,400 ms$3.4KAt riskPII exposure flagged in 3 sessions
Dealer / Partner SupportAgentforce90%4,800 ms$2.6KAt riskAttempted unauthorized system action

Real-time analytics

The same report, running continuously

Once the connectors are in, the weekly document becomes a live console. Every figure below traces back to an agent in the register, so a cost spike always has an owner.

  • $29.2K Weekly AI spend
  • +4.3% Week over week
  • $7.4K Weekly savings identified
  • $0.42 Cost per 1,000 requests
Spend trend and right-sizing projection
Weekly, $K Today Actual spend Projected with right-sizing applied

Spend by platform

Weekly, $K
$29.2K per week
  • Custom $17.1K, 59%
  • Agentforce $6.8K, 23%
  • SAP Joule $3.4K, 12%
  • ServiceNow $1.9K, 6%

Vendor-embedded platforms carry $12.1K a week, 41% of total spend, across four agents nobody built in-house.

Costliest agents this week

Colored by status
  • Claims Fraud Triage$5.6K
  • Underwriting Support$4.2K
  • Vendor Invoice Matching$3.4K
  • Claims Intake$3.1K
  • Customer Service Bot$2.8K

Right-sizing opportunities

$7.4K per week identified
  • Claims Fraud Triage

    Route low-confidence cases to human review, move classification to a mid-tier model

    High confidence $2.4K
  • Underwriting Support

    Cache retrieval results and cut redundant tool calls per session

    High confidence $1.9K
  • Vendor Invoice Matching

    Mask PII upstream and batch document requests

    Medium confidence $1.6K
  • Customer Service Bot

    Enable prompt caching across the twenty most common intents

    High confidence $1.5K

Optimize

Find, explain, fix

The service should not only report metrics. It should trigger ownership and change.

MetricMeasurement approach
Accuracy issueUpdate prompt and RAG source, add a golden test, route low-confidence cases to human review
Cost anomalyRight-size the model, cache, batch, throttle, remove duplicated agent calls
Latency issueSimplify the workflow, reduce tool calls, move heavy evaluation async
Risk exceptionLimit privileges, add approvals, mask PII, enforce policy guardrails
Poor adoptionImprove workflow fit, UI triggers, training and process ownership

Weekly cadence creates accountability. Analytics infrastructure creates continuous control.

90-day rollout

A practical path to enterprise visibility

A low-friction, services-led entry that can mature into a managed assurance platform.

  1. 0 to 30 days

    Inventory and baseline

    • Identify agents and owners
    • Build the agent register
    • Sample key transactions
    • Define metrics and risk tiers
  2. 31 to 60 days

    Weekly assurance

    • Publish the weekly report
    • Run accuracy, cost and risk reviews
    • Create the remediation backlog
    • Validate savings and value hypotheses
  3. 61 to 90 days

    Optimize spend and models

    • Connect high-priority data sources
    • Create the data store and dashboards
    • Automate recurring metrics
    • Add alerts and budget guardrails
  4. After 90 days

    Analytics foundation

    • Drift and regression testing
    • Model and vendor optimization
    • Process redesign
    • Governance committee support

Real-World Success Stories

Explore our case studies to see how Wizr is helping enterprises drive measurable
transformation with AI.

Start with the inventory.
See every agent by week one.

AI-powered, human-driven. Inventory, cost, risk and governance for all your enterprise agents.

Talk to AI Expert
See how Wizr AI delivers up to 40-60% faster outcomes with AI-powered automation & engineering! Contact Us